- Subscribe
- My alerts
- Log in
- My Cart
Advanced Search
- Home
- Content
- Current
- Ahead of print
- Past Issues
- JNM Supplement
- SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
- JNM Podcasts
- Continuing Education
- Subscriptions
- Subscribers
- Institutional and Non-member
- Rates
- Journal Claims
- Authors
- Submit to JNM
- Information for Authors
- Assignment of Copyright
- AQARA requirements
- Info
- Reviewers
- Permissions
- Advertisers
- About
- About Us
- Editorial Board
- Contact Information
- More
- Alerts
- Feedback
- Help
- SNMMI Journals
- View or Listen to JNM Podcast
- Visit JNM on Facebook
- Join JNM on LinkedIn
- Follow JNM on Twitter
- Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportEarly Phase (Phase 0 or I) human studies
Brad Kline, Rahul Aggarwal, Robert Flavell, Courtney Lawhn Heath, Yan Li, Robin Ippisch and Thomas Hope
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 2279;
- Article
Abstract
2279
Introduction: 68Ga-FAP-2286 is a novel imaging agent under investigation for its ability to detect metastatic disease in patients with solid tumors. 68Ga-FAP-2286 is a peptidomimetic molecule that targets fibroblast activation protein (FAP), a transmembrane protein highly expressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). CAFs are present in many solid tumors, making FAP an ideal target for detecting sites of metastasis across a range of cancer types. Here, we present initial, first-in-human data on safety, biodistribution, and image quality in patients who received 68Ga-FAP-2286 (NCT04621435).
Methods: From December 2020 through December 2021, 26 patients were imaged by PET/CT or PET/MRI at a single center. On the day of imaging, patients were injected with 5.9 ± 1.3 mCi of 68Ga-FAP-2286 60 ± 13 minutes before scanning. Patients underwent pre- and post-imaging lab evaluations, physical exams, vital signs assessments, and ECGs to evaluate safety. Adverse event assessments were performed on the day of imaging and again 1-3 days later. Enrolled patients were grouped by administered dose ranges of 3-4.5 mCi (n=6), 4.5-6.5 mCi (n=10), and 6.5-8 mCi (n=10). The mean and standard deviation of the SUVmean in the kidneys, liver, spleen, and blood pool were recorded to investigate biodistribution and image quality. For qualitative analysis of image quality, images were graded on a five point Likert Scale (from 1-non-diagnostic to 5-good image quality). For quantitative analysis, the noise in the liver and blood pool were measured, where noise was defined as the standard deviation of the organ or blood pool divided by the mean.
Results: Among 26 participants, no serious adverse events were reported. Lab evaluations, physical exams, vital signs, and ECGs showed no clinically significant changes after imaging. Average SUVmean ± SD in the kidneys, liver, spleen, and blood pool was 4.6 ± 1.6, 2.2 ± 0.9, 1.0 ± 0.4, and 1.4 ± 0.4, respectively. The average uptake in tumor versus background (tumor-to-background ratio) was 14.4 (Figure 1). All images received Likert scores ≥ 4, consistent with diagnostic quality scans, with average scores of 4.8, 4.4, and 4.7 in the 3-4.5 mCi, 4.5-6.5 mCi, and 6.5-8 mCi dose groups. Likert scores stratified by scanner were 4.9 for PET/CT and 4.3 for PET/MRI. Noise measurements in the liver were 0.16 ± 0.04, 0.22 ± 0.08, and 0.16 ± 0.09 in patients who received 3-4.5 mCi, 4.5-6.5 mCi, and 6.5-8 mCi. Noise measurements in the blood pool were 0.20 ± 0.06, 0.26 ± 0.08, and 0.17 ± 0.07 in patients administered with 3-4.5 mCi, 4.5-6.5 mCi, and 6.5-8 mCi. There were no differences in noise measurements in the liver across dose groups (P > 0.05). In the blood pool, noise was higher in patients dosed with 4.5-6.5 mCi compared to 6.5-8 mCi (P = 0.025) but equivalent between all other groups.
Conclusions: 68Ga-FAP-2286 demonstrates a good safety profile. Biodistribution data indicates the greatest uptake in the kidneys, followed by the liver and the spleen, as well as excellent uptake into the tumor. There was no clear relationship between injected activity and image quality or noise. However, a difference in image quality between scanner types was noted, which is likely due to the reconstruction methods used by the two manufacturers. In summary, our preliminary data demonstrates that 68Ga-FAP-2286 is safe and produces diagnostic quality scans that could aid in the detection of metastatic disease in patients with solid tumors.
- Download figure
- Open in new tab
- Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top
In this issue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
- Table of Contents
- Index by author
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
- Facebook Like
- Google Plus One
Bookmark this article
Jump to section
- Article
Related Articles
No related articles found.
- Google Scholar
Cited By...
No citing articles found.
- Google Scholar
More in this TOC Section
A novel SSTR antagonist [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4: from bench (radiolabeling) to bedside (first-in-human study)
First-in-Humans: Tissue Factor PET Imaging using 18F-labeled Active-Site Inhibited Factor VII
Value of 18F-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in bone and joint lesions in lung cancer patients: far beyond diagnosis
Show more Early Phase (Phase 0 or I) human studies